Stay on Jadhav’s hanging Case

In the case of Kulbhushan Jadhav, the International Court of India has won a major victory from the court, ICJ on Thursday. Judge banned Jadhav’s hanging till the last verdict. At the same time, Pakistan has refused to accept the decision of the international court adopting a formidable approach.
ICJ President Ronnie Abraham told Pakistan to give permission to meet Indian officials and Yadav’s family Court ruled that Jadhav’s life is in danger The court said that the Vienna Treaty does not mean that the spying and terrorism accused should not be allowed political diplomatic so that hearing in his case is his right
Abraham said that Pak Jadhav’s hanging should be given to the court in full details of the operation of the disease. It is worth mentioning that the military court of Pakistan had on April 10 sentenced Kulbhushan Jadhav to death for espionage and terrorism.

Advertisements

What is the Vienna agreement???

Kulbhushan Jadhav (file photo)

What is the Vienna agreement

This is an international agreement, Under which a citizen of a country is detained in another country ,He will have the right to meet the officials of the High Commission or Embassy of his country. The full name of this agreement is ‘Optional Protocol to the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations Concerning Compulsory Settlement of Disabilities, 1963’.

– India signed the agreement in November 1977 and Pakistan in March 1976 

Possible to stop hanging without hearing?

Under the agreement, Article 74 of the rules of ICJ, Under paragraph 4, any member of the Chief of ICJ can request a ban on hanging from the country without hearing.

Why did not India go to ICJ in the torture and murder case of Indian Army officer Saurabh Kalia? This matter does not come under the purview of ICJ, as per the Declaration of India’s September 18, 1974

– Controversies related to animosity, fighting, self-defense do not come under its purview.

– Controversy arising from all agreements in which all parties are not part of the agreement or the government’s consent on this does not fall within its purview.

Pak was also in favor of decision

India has filed a case in ICJ after 46 years. Prior to this, in 1971, after the abduction of the Indian Airlines Airlines aircraft in 1971, the ICJ reached the ICJ for flying rights of Pakistani aircraft in their airspace. Although the court’s decision came in favor of Pakistan.

Pakistan will follow the instructions of ICJ?
ICJ has stated on its website that its orders are fully binding And Since all members of the United Nations are sworn in to accept the order of the international court, Therefore, it is not possible to not implement his decision. 

Although there are some exceptions, Because the international court does not have any direct power to enforce its order. 

Not implemented, So he could apologize to United Nations Security on this. In such a situation where the army’s decision in Pakistan is final. In such a situation if the Sharif government wishes to accept the decision of the ICJ, will the army accept it? This is a great question.

What is icj

ICJ is the important judicial body of the United Nations. It was founded in Hewel, Holland, in 1945, and began working since 1946.

– The ICJ has 15 judges who are elected by the United Nations General Assembly and the Security Council for nine years.

– Its official language are en and French .

What is the jurisdiction?

According to ICJ’s website, its work is to resolve legal disputes between the two countries and to give opinion on legal questions raised by authorized UN bodies and special agencies. That is, it has three special duties –

1. According to international law, it decides on legal disputes.

2. Shows judgment on dispute between the two sides.

3. The UN gives opinions on the requests of the units.

Army officer Wife sent PM Narendra Modi  56 inch bra

 The matter is from Haryana’s Fatehabad. The reason is being said, the vandalism done by Pakistan with the bodies of the soldiers. In the last days on the border, the family of a former soldier in the district has become so angry with the presence of soldiers with the help of the soldiers.That he sent 56-inch underwear to Prime Minister Narendra Modi through the Sainik Board reminding him of the promises made before the election. 

Fatehabad district’s ex-serviceman Dharmaveer Kajla and his wife Suman have also sent a memorandum along with an underwear on Thursday, In which he has been reminded that before the election, when Hemraj’s head of Mathura was cut off by Pakistani soldiers So he had tensed on the then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh that nothing would be possible to send a love letter to Pakistan, He will have to answer in the same language. 

As soon as Suman placed underwear and memorandum before the officers of the District Sainik Board, The officers of the Sainik Board came in and once, they put the burglar in the side But when her husband and ex-serviceman Dharmaveer Kajla, who was present with Suman, opposed it, after reading the full memorandum, the authorities assured to send the memorandum and the intruder to the Prime Minister’s Office. 

During this whole sentence, besides the officers and employees of the District Sainik Board, people who came there were also competing to see the whole sentences. Later speaking to the media, former Soldier Dharmaveer Kajla and his wife Suman said that as a former soldier, our blood clutches arise when our soldiers on the border are suffering. 

Enemy soldiers kill them and cut their heads off. Suman said that despite the gun in Kashmir, the army personnel could not do anything. In such a scenario, the minister and the prime minister, sitting in Delhi, just blow a bombshell and accept the duty of their duty.. It should not happen. He said that today by sending the 56-inch armor to the Prime Minister, we have reminded him of his promise that he should now show the 56-inch chest to the enemy country and give the army authority to act.

Three Supreme Court judgments on divorce today, 5 judges of different religions will decide

New Delhi: The Supreme Court will start hearing from Thursday on the petitions challenging the constitutional validity of three divorces, marriage halls and polytheism.

 Chief Justice Jagdish Singh will start hearing a seven-member bench of five-member constitution headed by Khehar. Among them, five petitions have been filed by Muslim women, challenging the practice of three divorces prevailing in the Muslim community, it has been described as unconstitutional. 

Other members of this bench include Justice Kurian Joseph, Justice RF Nariman, Justice Uday Umesh Lalit and Justice Abdul Nazir. The Constitution bench will take the main issue only for the petition as ‘petition for equality of Muslim women’.

The members of the Constitution Ben are from different religious communities including Sikh, Christian, Parsi, Hindu and Muslim. The hearing of this case has become more important because the apex court decided to consider it during the summer holidays. And he even suggested that he could sit on Saturdays and Sundays too, to speedily decide on sensitive issues raised in this case.

Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi will help the Constitution bench in this matter and will also see the extent to which the court can intervene in Muslim Personal Law. The apex court itself had taken cognizance of the question that whether women are victims of sexual bias due to divorce or their husbands due to second marriage.  By considering the matter, the apex court will also give its decision on constitutionalism and validity of the ‘three divorces’, ‘Nodh Halala’ and the polytheism practice prevailing in Muslim society.

Jadhav was sentenced to death for ‘espionage and destructive activities’.

ISLAMABADD: On Wednesday (May 10), Pakistani officials banned from the International Court of Justice on the hanging of Indian civil servant Kulbhushan Jadhav, who was awarded death sentence by the military court on charges of ‘Pakistan has not officially responded to the order of the IC-based Hague.

    Local media has rejected India’s claim. Geo TV said that the ICJ does not come to Pakistan in the jurisdiction because it can take cognizance of the matter with the consent of both the parties.. Dawn’s online website has not provided any information about India’s claim to the ban. Similarly, the Express Tribune did not mention the order to stop the news on this issue..

    Jadhav (46) was sentenced to death last month. India had turned against the Pakistanis for ICJ alleging that Pakistan violated the Vienna Treaty in the Jadhav case. India has argued in its appeal that it was not informed about the arrest of Jadhav for a long time after he was arrested and Pakistan did not inform the accused about his rights.

    India said that in violation of the Vienna Treaty, Pakistani authorities rejected India’s rights of diplomatic access to Jadhav despite repeated requests. The ICJ confirmed the receipt of an application from India in a statement on May 8. External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj said in New Delhi on Tuesday (May 9th) that she talked to Jadhav’s mother and told him about the order of ICJ.

    Pakistan claims that its security forces had arrested Jadhav from the troubled Balochistan province on March 3, last year after allegedly entering Iran. Pakistan claims that Jadhav is an officer of the Indian Navy. Jadhav was sentenced to death for ‘espionage and destructive activities’.

    India has admitted that Jadhav is a navy officer but rejects any kind of relationship with the government. India said that Jadhav was abducted from Iran. India has also sent Jadhav’s mother’s appeal to Pakistan, in which her punishment has been asked to start the reversal.

    A meeting was held for the Naxal-affected states under the leadership of Home Minister Shri Rajnath Singh.

    Under the leadership of Home Minister Shri Rajnath Singh, the Chief Ministers of the Naxal-affected states joined the meeting held in New Delhi. 

    National Defense Advisor Mr. Ajit Doval, Union Home Secretary, senior officials of the states have also been included in this. It will be discussed on the shared strategy of tackling the Naxal problem.

    • Government also decided that in future review meetings, apart from sectoral progress we will also review district wise progress in key areas.
    •  focus is on boosting solar equipment manufacturing. The energy sector will gain & employment opportunities will also increase.

    Prime Minister Narendra Modi now in Jharkhand for the inauguration of Ganga Bridge between Sahibganj and Katihar

    The Prime Minister Narendra Modi is in Jharkhand for the inauguration of Ganga river Bridge. The Prime Minister of India is welcomed by Chief Minister of Jharkhand and governor Draupadi murmu. The inauguration of Ganga river bridge is caused by 2000 crore this Bridge connecting the road of Sahibganj and Katihar of Bihar. This is Bridge is the first Bridge of the Jharkhand at the river of Ganga. It may take 2 complete 2021 after that the distance between Jharkhand and Bihar decreases by 10 hours and that can be travelled in 2 hours that’s why in this way the trading and business is Gate more significantly quicker and list time.

    The longest bridge of the  country all of you know that the Ganga is only found in Sahibganj at Jharkhand that is likely at 83 kilometre long in Jharkhand there is also 5 Bridge in Bihar but it is also second largest bridge of India. The range of the Bridge is approx 22 kilometre long but only 6 kilometre inside the Ganga the remaining part of this Bridge connected with approach Road.

    Prime Minister also distributed tablets between the sevika