Can Change a Cut-Off Formula

Image: Delhi University

 Delhi University may change the cut-off formula for admission to undergraduate courses. The DU administration recently held a meeting with the Principal of all the colleges on appeal to the CBSE. In this, it was considered that this time, due to the change in the number of moderation policy, the CBSE students did not get a chance to get a chance.

The cbse has demanded that the CBSE students also got the full chance in DU admissions. In fact, CBSE has changed the issue policy this time. Under the first issue moderation policy, the test takers were given 15% more marks if the questions were difficult in a particular question paper.

For example, if a student has achieved a smart number in a subject of 17 and the board feels that the paper was difficult, then 15 numbers were given extra,In this way, overall, his flowering was 75. You will not give this kind of insertion point to CBSE students. In December 2016, the CBSE had appealed to the Human Resource Development Ministry to persuade all state boards to make changes in Points Model and Policy, Otherwise, they may have to suffer loss in admission to graduate course.

Stay on Jadhav’s hanging Case

In the case of Kulbhushan Jadhav, the International Court of India has won a major victory from the court, ICJ on Thursday. Judge banned Jadhav’s hanging till the last verdict. At the same time, Pakistan has refused to accept the decision of the international court adopting a formidable approach.
ICJ President Ronnie Abraham told Pakistan to give permission to meet Indian officials and Yadav’s family Court ruled that Jadhav’s life is in danger The court said that the Vienna Treaty does not mean that the spying and terrorism accused should not be allowed political diplomatic so that hearing in his case is his right
Abraham said that Pak Jadhav’s hanging should be given to the court in full details of the operation of the disease. It is worth mentioning that the military court of Pakistan had on April 10 sentenced Kulbhushan Jadhav to death for espionage and terrorism.

What is the Vienna agreement???

Kulbhushan Jadhav (file photo)

What is the Vienna agreement

This is an international agreement, Under which a citizen of a country is detained in another country ,He will have the right to meet the officials of the High Commission or Embassy of his country. The full name of this agreement is ‘Optional Protocol to the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations Concerning Compulsory Settlement of Disabilities, 1963’.

– India signed the agreement in November 1977 and Pakistan in March 1976 

Possible to stop hanging without hearing?

Under the agreement, Article 74 of the rules of ICJ, Under paragraph 4, any member of the Chief of ICJ can request a ban on hanging from the country without hearing.

Why did not India go to ICJ in the torture and murder case of Indian Army officer Saurabh Kalia? This matter does not come under the purview of ICJ, as per the Declaration of India’s September 18, 1974

– Controversies related to animosity, fighting, self-defense do not come under its purview.

– Controversy arising from all agreements in which all parties are not part of the agreement or the government’s consent on this does not fall within its purview.

Pak was also in favor of decision

India has filed a case in ICJ after 46 years. Prior to this, in 1971, after the abduction of the Indian Airlines Airlines aircraft in 1971, the ICJ reached the ICJ for flying rights of Pakistani aircraft in their airspace. Although the court’s decision came in favor of Pakistan.

Pakistan will follow the instructions of ICJ?
ICJ has stated on its website that its orders are fully binding And Since all members of the United Nations are sworn in to accept the order of the international court, Therefore, it is not possible to not implement his decision. 

Although there are some exceptions, Because the international court does not have any direct power to enforce its order. 

Not implemented, So he could apologize to United Nations Security on this. In such a situation where the army’s decision in Pakistan is final. In such a situation if the Sharif government wishes to accept the decision of the ICJ, will the army accept it? This is a great question.

What is icj

ICJ is the important judicial body of the United Nations. It was founded in Hewel, Holland, in 1945, and began working since 1946.

– The ICJ has 15 judges who are elected by the United Nations General Assembly and the Security Council for nine years.

– Its official language are en and French .

What is the jurisdiction?

According to ICJ’s website, its work is to resolve legal disputes between the two countries and to give opinion on legal questions raised by authorized UN bodies and special agencies. That is, it has three special duties –

1. According to international law, it decides on legal disputes.

2. Shows judgment on dispute between the two sides.

3. The UN gives opinions on the requests of the units.

Three Supreme Court judgments on divorce today, 5 judges of different religions will decide

New Delhi: The Supreme Court will start hearing from Thursday on the petitions challenging the constitutional validity of three divorces, marriage halls and polytheism.

 Chief Justice Jagdish Singh will start hearing a seven-member bench of five-member constitution headed by Khehar. Among them, five petitions have been filed by Muslim women, challenging the practice of three divorces prevailing in the Muslim community, it has been described as unconstitutional. 

Other members of this bench include Justice Kurian Joseph, Justice RF Nariman, Justice Uday Umesh Lalit and Justice Abdul Nazir. The Constitution bench will take the main issue only for the petition as ‘petition for equality of Muslim women’.

The members of the Constitution Ben are from different religious communities including Sikh, Christian, Parsi, Hindu and Muslim. The hearing of this case has become more important because the apex court decided to consider it during the summer holidays. And he even suggested that he could sit on Saturdays and Sundays too, to speedily decide on sensitive issues raised in this case.

Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi will help the Constitution bench in this matter and will also see the extent to which the court can intervene in Muslim Personal Law. The apex court itself had taken cognizance of the question that whether women are victims of sexual bias due to divorce or their husbands due to second marriage.  By considering the matter, the apex court will also give its decision on constitutionalism and validity of the ‘three divorces’, ‘Nodh Halala’ and the polytheism practice prevailing in Muslim society.

A meeting was held for the Naxal-affected states under the leadership of Home Minister Shri Rajnath Singh.

Under the leadership of Home Minister Shri Rajnath Singh, the Chief Ministers of the Naxal-affected states joined the meeting held in New Delhi. 

National Defense Advisor Mr. Ajit Doval, Union Home Secretary, senior officials of the states have also been included in this. It will be discussed on the shared strategy of tackling the Naxal problem.

  • Government also decided that in future review meetings, apart from sectoral progress we will also review district wise progress in key areas.
  •  focus is on boosting solar equipment manufacturing. The energy sector will gain & employment opportunities will also increase.

Delhi gange rape decisions :Hanged All 4 victims


Supreme Court on Friday upheld death sentences to the four convicted in the Nirbhaya gang-rape case.
The brutal crime against the 23-year-old victim had provoked national outrage and demand for a more stringent law to deal with sex crimes against women.
The victim was assaulted and raped by six persons in a moving bus in south Delhi and thrown out of the vehicle along with her male friend on December 16 night. She later died in a Singapore hospital.
In 2013, Criminal Law (Amendment) Bill, 2013 or the Anti-Rape Bill, which was later called the Nirbhaya Act, came into existence. The new law mandated death penalty under Section 376A of the Indian Penal Code.
Under Section 376A, whoever commits rape, which leads to the death of the victim or causes her to be in a “persistent vegetative state,” shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a minimum term of 20 years which may extend to life or with death.
Marathon hearings
The three-judge Bench led by Justice Dipak Misra wrapped up the marathon hearings on their appeals on March 27. The appeals were heard for almost a year on a day-to-day basis.
The arguments ended with senior advocate Siddharth Luthra, appearing for the Delhi Police, strongly pushing for death penalty for the convicts as a proportionate punishment for their “brutal crime.”
Amicus curiae and senior advocate Raju Ramachandran had, however, opposed, asking the court to consider sentencing the convicts to a life in prison.
Incidentally, the Bench had prima facie agreed with the contention of the amicus that Section 235 of the Code of Criminal Procedure — which provides that a trial court should individually hear a convict before sentencing him — was not followed in this case.